Skip to main content

Airlines and Software

This might be a little off topic, but after reading this article from USA Today, I thought the software industry should be inspired by the airline security system.



As far as I know, the reason why air flight is the safest way of traveling is much due to these aspects.

One, all the parts involved work toward ZERO fatalities.

Two, their effort is never "good enough".

Three, they have a very open mind, sharing all the information about problems and crashes (the system was born when planes were "constantly" crashing so the pilots were very interested in sharing their experiences !)

Four, unfortunately aircafts can't really pull over to change a flat tyre or stop to check their engine along the road !
Airplane manufacturers are therefore forced to build better, safer airplanes with improved safety and performance. Maintenance technicians are also forced to improve procedures to enhance reliability and safety and I think that regulators contribute with controlled procedures and checklists to avoid omissions or carelessness, and accident investigators generate a fair and exhaustive analysis of the accidents.

There are also other factors, but they are valid for any other transportation systems: pilots improve their skills, there are better weather forecasts, customers "forced" the industry to adopt new technologies, training methods and to improve human performance, etc.

I guess that software makers (including myself) should think about this !

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why is business people so "unorganized" ?

The more I work, the more I see "strange" behaviour both on the side of our customers, both on our side and on my personal side. I will try to understand way better why we are so changing, hectic, often unpredictable in our business hours.  I guess all this could be linked to the Complex, Complicated thing...

Practical advices by Karl Wiegers

I am reading the beautiful book "More About Software Requirements: Thorny Issues and Practical Advice" by Karl E. Wiegers. I'd like to share with you two of the most important points of his "10 cosmic truth",  that to me are #6 and #9. #6 The requirements might be vague, but the product will be specific. I would say this is the usual point of "Natura abhorret a vacuo", that is here... each gap n requirements will be filled by some bad feature. #9 The customer is not always right, but the customer always has a point. Never underrate your key users

0. What's the matter with requirements ?

In my experience, many problems arising from the little care in requirements gathering are mainly due to these five factors: Pre-judgments: we believe we know how to do the right thing before we even realize what we have to do, We do like to "settle" things "later", End users often do not know exactly what they want, or express themselves in their own way and often different users have conflicting requirements, The requirements now are constantly changing: as soon as we catch some, some other requirement has already changed, Often there are organizational or "political" factors involved (ie. we listen more to the requirements of a manager who will never use the system rather than the requirement of the user who will use it 10 times a day).